Weight
3.7 kg
Power
| Ac output i | 300 W (7 others) |
| Battery size i | 266 Wh |
| Charge time i | 1 h (7 others) |
| Charge time (solar) i | 2.6 h (2 others) |
| Charge time (car) i | 2.6 h |
| Solar input (max) i | 100 W (6 others) |
Ports
| Number of outputs (total) i | 6 (7 others) |
| Ac ports i | 2 (17 others) |
| Usb c ports i | 1 (16 others) |
| USB Ports i | 2 (48 others) |
| Car ports i | 1 (92 others) |
| Tt 30 ports i | 0 (70 others) |
Design
| Weight i | 3.7 kg |
| Has A Display i | ✔ (103 others) |
| Has a touch screen i | ✖ |
| Has a carry handle i | ✔ (101 others) |
Similar products
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does the Ampace Andes 300 take to charge?
At 1 h, the Ampace Andes 300 is 45% below the category average for charge time, ranking #4 out of 81 — see ranking portable power station products.
How long does the Ampace Andes 300 take to charge?
At 2.6 h, the Ampace Andes 300 is 76% below the category average for charge time (car), ranking #4 out of 53 — see ranking portable power station products.
What is the solar input (max) of the Ampace Andes 300?
At 100 W, the Ampace Andes 300 is 89% below the category average for solar input (max), ranking #96 out of 102 — see ranking portable power station products.
How many ac output does the Ampace Andes 300 have?
At 300 W, the Ampace Andes 300 is 86% below the category average for ac output, ranking #95 out of 104 — see ranking portable power station products.
What is the battery size of the Ampace Andes 300?
At 266 Wh, the Ampace Andes 300 is 85% below the category average for battery size, ranking #97 out of 104 — see ranking portable power station products.
Is the Ampace Andes 300 lightweight?
Yes. At 3.7 kg, the Ampace Andes 300 is 82% below the category average for weight, ranking #11 out of 104 — see ranking portable power station products.
How many ac ports does the Ampace Andes 300 have?
At 2, the Ampace Andes 300 is 49% below the category average for ac ports, ranking #83 out of 102 — see ranking portable power station products.
How many number of outputs (total) does the Ampace Andes 300 have?
At 6, the Ampace Andes 300 is 48% below the category average for number of outputs (total), ranking #92 out of 101 — see ranking portable power station products.
How many USB ports does the Ampace Andes 300 have?
At 2, the Ampace Andes 300 is 27% below the category average for USB ports, ranking #49 out of 103 — see ranking portable power station products.
How long does the Ampace Andes 300 take to charge?
At 2.6 h, the Ampace Andes 300 is 11% below the category average for charge time (solar), ranking #37 out of 78 — see ranking portable power station products.
How does it compare?
How does the Ampace Andes 300's solar input (max) compare to similar portable power stationss?
At 100 W, the Ampace Andes 300 trails the EcoFlow Delta Pro Ultra (4000 W) by 98%.
How does the Ampace Andes 300's ac output compare to similar portable power stationss?
At 300 W, the Ampace Andes 300 trails the EcoFlow Delta Pro Ultra (7200 W) by 96%.
How does the Ampace Andes 300's battery size compare to similar portable power stationss?
At 266 Wh, the Ampace Andes 300 trails the EcoFlow Delta Pro Ultra (6000 Wh) by 96%.
How does the Ampace Andes 300's weight compare to similar portable power stationss?
At 3.7 kg, the Ampace Andes 300 leads the Fossibot F7200 (70 kg) by 95%.
How does the Ampace Andes 300's charge time (car) compare to similar portable power stationss?
At 2.6 h, the Ampace Andes 300 leads the Blackview Oscal Powermax 6000 (15 h) by 83%.
How does the Ampace Andes 300's ac ports compare to similar portable power stationss?
At 2, the Ampace Andes 300 trails the Anker Solix F3800 (6) by 67%.
How does the Ampace Andes 300's USB-C ports compare to similar portable power stationss?
At 1, the Ampace Andes 300 trails the Anker Solix F3800 (3) by 67%.
How does the Ampace Andes 300's charge time compare to similar portable power stationss?
At 1 h, the Ampace Andes 300 leads the Anker Solix F3800 (2.7 h) by 63%.
How does the Ampace Andes 300's number of outputs (total) compare to similar portable power stationss?
At 6, the Ampace Andes 300 trails the Blackview Oscal PowerMax 2400 Pro (16) by 63%.
How does the Ampace Andes 300's USB ports compare to similar portable power stationss?
At 2, the Ampace Andes 300 trails the Blackview Oscal Powermax 6000 (4) by 50%.
How does the Ampace Andes 300's charge time (solar) compare to similar portable power stationss?
At 2.6 h, the Ampace Andes 300 trails the Blackview Oscal Powermax 6000 (1.5 h) by 42%.